In a Street fight wich martial art is the best?

by banksy on August 11, 2009

Its not about meditation, its a bout a specific situation of life…its just about wich martial art will give you the best chances of winning a street fight against any oponent, maybe much bigger higher and stronger than you, a normal oponent without martial arts knowledge or with expertise in any kind of martial arts.
To be more specific lets say you are 140 Lbs (63kg) and + o – 1,65cm of height
Wich martial art and why will give you the best chances of winning?

Related posts:

  1. Which Martial Art is best for self defense in a street fight?
  2. Anyone here been in a street fight that knows a martial art?
  3. wwich type of martial art would be best in a street fight?
  4. i am very weak person. which is the best martial art for me to save from street fight without weapons ?
  5. Are there any Blackbelts (any martial art) that have lost a street fight badly?

{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }

zoomddy2 August 11, 2009 at 6:27 am

The one with guns.

sorry . . . no rules in a street fight

calipam August 11, 2009 at 6:27 am

I’m thinking, Tae kwondo.(sp?) You can do alot of damage with a good kick.

Tallon August 11, 2009 at 6:27 am

Ye but there is a law to shooting people
Muay Thai looks lethal! check it out on youtube look at 0.37 and 0.51 specifically

daofmi August 11, 2009 at 6:27 am

So many types. I guess it depends on what "winning" means to you. If it’s one person I’d go with grappling, although some times that means taking a hit. Jiu-Jitsu is nice. Being a small guy though you do have quickness. Sometimes where you hit makes as much a difference as how your hitting. Ninjitsu as well as overall common sense says to go for weak points in a person: knees, solar plexus, throat, groin, temple, eyes, nose, ears. Then again I ask you should "winning" mean death to one’s opponent. I’d have to go with Ninjitsu. I’m not a practitioner, but speed as well as finesse is what that’s about and if you don’t have time to be bigger and stronger, then I’d go for smarter and faster.

obestunna August 11, 2009 at 6:27 am

Honestly your best bet is wrestling.. It isn’t as flashy but taking a guy to the ground and controlling him will win you most fights

R. Lee August 11, 2009 at 6:27 am

I’d say you’d need to learn the ancient art of FIGHTING.

It is a vague question and a direct answer would not be meaningful no matter what answer you get. One can spend a decade training under the name of any sort of thing a human being can make up and still get KTFO in 3 seconds. There are names that have more street cred than others but it really comes down to the skill of the individual and the teacher.

I could tell you to go learn kickboxing, but you can spend 10 yrs practicing kickboxing and not get any better at fighting for whatever reason. You should look at more than the name of the martial art/combat sport.

entangld August 11, 2009 at 6:27 am

GLOCK-KI-DO

kerel August 11, 2009 at 6:27 am

actually the best way is to run off as quickly as you can,if you can. this because you dont know your opponent ability. but if you are stuck in the scenario, look your surrounding, find anything that can be your weapon. it better to use a weapon rather than your hand/kicking technique. let the opponent attack you first, try to block the attack, if you got the chance to run away. run as fast as you can. hand technique is the best way to deal in a street fight, kicking is just as a finishing touch of your self defense technique. try silat,karate, wushu, jeet kun do, or kung fu. these martial art are best known in their hand technique and 3 second K.O combat movement.

peacefulwarrior August 11, 2009 at 6:27 am

The art of Ching-Ching Pow. Specifically a .45…

Seriously, no one certain art is better for practical fights than any other. Every situation calls for soemthing different. The most dangerous martial artist is the one that can blend with his opponents style; overcoming their weakness.

All martial arts were created with the same purpose; go into a threatening situation and come out on the other side alive. So, rather than look at the specific art, try looking at how the art is taught. I’ve seen some instructors teach arts in certain ways that had no real practical application whatsoever. I have also seen different instructors teaching the same exact art form in devastatingly practical ways that showed to be very effective.

Bluto Blutarsky7 August 11, 2009 at 6:27 am

a weapon art.

A concealable weapon you can carry with you and is legal to carry. like a knife or stick (walking stick) or a small metal rod (depends on the state).

Or a CCW permit to carry a firearm.

Man invented weapons to make them equal. Bigger stronger people will always have an advantage in unarmed fighting, that is why we used our reason (a trait which sets us apart from all other non-primates, dolphins and politicians) to invent weapons so that 250lb Ug is now not as dangerous to 150lb Thug who carries with him his stone dagger or his big tree limb to use as a club.

martial spy August 11, 2009 at 6:27 am

It depends. In a true combat situation that may involve weapons, and an ambush, martaial arts that focus on a competive sport will not help, but in a one on one situation the sport martial art may work just fine. I have secretly always wanted to be a better fighter than I am, but I realize I don’t have to be the world’s best fighter to be dangerous. In fact an old man with the right know- how could surprise a UFC champion. http://www.geocities.com/dennisservaes/personal.html

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: